Wisedocs blog
-
How To

The Impact of Duplicate Records in Medical Record Reviews

Duplicate records are much more common in medical record reviews than one might think. These duplications can arise from clerical errors, systems efficiencies, or patient transfers between healthcare providers.

Published on:
May 22, 2024

Duplicate records are much more common in medical record reviews than one might think. With the complexity of healthcare systems and the diverse sources of patient information, including electronic health records (EHRs), diagnostic reports, and clinical notes, the likelihood of encountering duplicates is substantial. These duplications can arise from clerical errors, systems efficiencies, or patient transfers between healthcare providers. Redundant entries consume valuable time and resources while introducing the risk of errors, often resulting in delayed claim resolutions. As professionals navigate extensive medical record reviews, it’s imperative for them to explore solutions that mitigate the impact of duplicate records and ultimately save both time and money.

What Challenges Arise from Duplicate Records?

Duplicate records in medical record review present significant challenges across the healthcare, litigation, and insurance sectors. These challenges can include:

Increased Time and Resources

Identifying and consolidating duplicate records is a time-consuming and resource-intensive task. Professionals often rely on manual methods or basic software algorithms to flag potential duplicates, which can be inefficient and prone to errors. Medical and litigation staff can spend hours sifting through numerous records, comparing information to determine if duplicates exist. This process consumes valuable time and resources that could be better utilized for patient and client care or other administrative tasks.

Potential Errors in Flagging

Automated systems or manual review processes may not accurately identify all duplicate records. False positives and false negatives are common, leading to either redundant review efforts or missed duplicates. False positives occur when records are incorrectly flagged as duplicates, leading to unnecessary review and wasted resources. False negatives occur when duplicate records are not identified, leading to incomplete patient histories and potential medical errors with lasting effects.

Backlog for Decision-Making and Claim Resolution

The presence of duplicate records can create a backlog in healthcare systems, delaying decision-making and claim resolution processes. When multiple records exist for a single patient, clinicians and administrators must reconcile discrepancies and ensure that accurate information is used for treatment decisions and insurance claims. This backlog can lead to delays in patient care, billing inaccuracies, and increased administrative burden.

Data Integrity and Safety Concerns

Duplicate records can compromise data integrity and client or patient safety. Inaccurate or incomplete information resulting from duplicate records can lead to medical errors or costly legal bills. Additionally, duplicate records may contain conflicting information, making it challenging for professionals to obtain a comprehensive view of an individual’s medical history to make informed decisions.

Privacy and Security Risks

Duplicate records increase the potential for privacy and security breaches. Each additional medical record copy represents another entry point for unauthorized access or disclosure of sensitive information. Companies must implement robust data management practices and security measures to protect against breaches and uphold confidentiality. 

Addressing challenges posed by duplicate records requires a multifaceted approach involving improved data management systems, standardized record-keeping practices, and enhanced staff training. Automated algorithms and machine learning techniques can help streamline the identification and consolidation of duplicate records, reducing the burden on various professionals and minimizing error.

Resolving Duplicate Records with Automated Deduplication

Duplicate records are a prevalent medical issue in medical record review processes, often leading to inefficiencies, increased costs, and delays in decision-making. However, automated deduplication features like Wisedocs’ platform offer a solution, revolutionizing how medical records are managed and reviewed. By leveraging intelligent optical character recognition (ICR) and sophisticated algorithms, the platform swiftly identifies and isolates duplicated pages across entire cases, saving professionals hours of manual processing time, conclusively accelerating the review process, and reducing costs associated with labor-intensive tasks. 

Wisedocs’ de-duplication process streamlines the review process to omit duplicate pages and automatically organize records, enabling professionals to focus on critical aspects of their work instead of mundane tasks. By reducing processing time by over 80% and offering a trustworthy medical record index for every case uploaded, Wisedocs empowers professionals in the insurance, legal, and healthcare sectors to work more efficiently and deliver better outcomes for their clients and patients.

Alanna Andersen
Content Writer

Alanna Andersen is a professional freelancer in the art of writing, editing, and proofing. In her past life, she was a Booking Agent and Tour Manager in the music industry and restaurant General Manager in bustling downtown Toronto, Canada. As an avid researcher, she enjoys learning new things and expanding her knowledge. In her spare time, she enjoys travelling around the world, spending time with her cats, dancing to live music, and watching horror films.

try wisedocs

Ready to transform your document processing?